Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm

Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm

Sigma
38 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
91 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Sigma
40
Canon
97
Portrait
Sigma
34
Canon
95
Video Cinema
Sigma
40
Canon
90
Street
Sigma
34
Canon
82
Travel
Sigma
34
Canon
81
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
34
Canon
77
Landscape
Sigma
39
Canon
76
Professional
Sigma
39
Canon
75
Macro
Sigma
47
Canon
68

Spezifikationen

Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mmCanon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min28 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max105 mm135 mm
Elements1816
Groups1312
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements1
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max ApertureT22f/3.5
Min ApertureT33.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades127
Build
MountL-MountCanon EF-S
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight1.30 kg0.52 kg
Filter Thread82 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance400 mm390 mm
Max Magnification1:3.10.28x

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm

  • Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (72nd percentile)
  • Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports