Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic
88 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III 75-300mm

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III 75-300mm

Canon
66 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Panasonic
96
Canon
41
Budget
Panasonic
92
Canon
78
Landscape
Panasonic
90
Canon
54
Travel
Panasonic
90
Canon
67
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Canon
53
Professional
Panasonic
86
Canon
51
Portrait
Panasonic
84
Canon
64
Street
Panasonic
83
Canon
64
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
82
Canon
56

Spezifikationen

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mmCanon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III 75-300mm
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min28 mm75 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm300 mm
Elements1713
Groups139
Aspherical Elements10
ED Elements4
CoatingFluorine coatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/5.6
Min Aperture4-7.14-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountL-MountCanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.41 kg0.48 kg
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusDC
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm1.50 m
Max Magnification0.5x0.25x

Vor- & Nachteile

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III 75-300mm

  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average macro (26th percentile)

Preise

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III 75-300mm

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen