TTArtisan APO 35mm f/1.4 35mm

TTArtisan APO 35mm f/1.4 35mm

TTArtisan
60 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony
83 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Street
TTArtisan
53
Sony
82
Travel
TTArtisan
35
Sony
81
Budget
TTArtisan
51
Sony
80
Portrait
TTArtisan
73
Sony
75
Wildlife Sports
TTArtisan
43
Sony
70
Video Cinema
TTArtisan
67
Sony
69
Landscape
TTArtisan
48
Sony
68
Professional
TTArtisan
55
Sony
63
Macro
TTArtisan
54
Sony
58

Spezifikationen

TTArtisan APO 35mm f/1.4 35mmSony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm50 mm
Elements129
Groups98
Aspherical Elements14
ED Elements31
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2f/3.5
Min Aperturef/1.43.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades107
Build
MountLeica MSony E
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weight0.51 kg0.12 kg
Filter Thread52 mm41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyPZ
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance701 mm249 mm
Max Magnification0.215x

Vor- & Nachteile

TTArtisan APO 35mm f/1.4 35mm

  • Strong bokeh (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong aperture (77th percentile)
  • Below average macro (35th percentile)

Preise

Both products are similarly priced.

TTArtisan APO 35mm f/1.4 35mm0.018Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.025Score pro Dollar

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm bietet 1.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

TTArtisan APO 35mm f/1.4 35mm

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Fazit

Gewinner: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Scores 83 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 20 specs.

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen