Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm
Sigma
60 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Video Cinema
Professional
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 17 | 17 |
| Groups | 13 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | 1 | 4★ |
| Coating | Water- & Oil-Repellent Coating | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.2 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 11★ | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.76 kg | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | HLA-Driven High-Speed AF Motor | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 280 mm | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.3★ | 0.5x |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm
- Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong macro (75th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Preise
Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm
No current pricing available
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.
