Sony SEL1635Z
Sony
77 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Panasonic
89 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Landscape
Budget
Travel
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Spezifikationen
| Sony SEL1635Z | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 17 |
| Groups | 12 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 5★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | 2 | 4★ |
| Coating | Fluorine Coating | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.52 kg | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | XD Linear Motors★ | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4.5 stops | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 240 mm | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.19x | 0.5x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sony SEL1635Z
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (19th percentile)19th %ile
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong build (78th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (23rd percentile)
Preise
Sony SEL1635Z0.003Score pro Dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm0.004Score pro Dollar
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Sony SEL1635Z
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Scores 89 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.
