Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 II EVO 35mm
Viltrox
55 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Panasonic
86 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 II EVO 35mm | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 17 |
| Groups | 8 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | 2 | 4★ |
| Coating | HD nano multicoating | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.34 kg★ | 0.41 kg |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM★ | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 340 mm | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:10★ | 0.5x |
Vor- & Nachteile
Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 II EVO 35mm
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong optical (71st percentile)
- Strong macro (68th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Preise
Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 II EVO 35mm0.007Score pro Dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm0.004Score pro Dollar
Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 II EVO 35mm bietet 1.8x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 II EVO 35mm
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.
