Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE 35mm
Viltrox
67 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Professional
Landscape
Video Cinema
Budget
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | — | 15 |
| Groups | — | 10 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | — | 5★ |
| Coating | — | multilayer nanocoating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/1.2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 11★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Sony E |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.97 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | VCM |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 340 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:5.88★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE 35mm
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong macro (67th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Preise
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
No current pricing available
Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE 35mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE 35mm
Scores 67 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
