Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung
vs
TTArtisan AF 23mm f/1.4 23mm

TTArtisan AF 23mm f/1.4 23mm

TTArtisan
46 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Portrait
Sigma
59
TTArtisan
40
Budget
Sigma
56
TTArtisan
43
Macro
Sigma
16
TTArtisan
55
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
TTArtisan
36
Street
Sigma
46
TTArtisan
38
Professional
Sigma
42
TTArtisan
37
Travel
Sigma
40
TTArtisan
34
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
39
TTArtisan
26
Landscape
Sigma
33
TTArtisan
32

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSTTArtisan AF 23mm f/1.4 23mm
Optics
Typeprime
Focal Length Min16 mm23 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm23 mm
Elements8
Groups6
ED Elements1
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/16
Min Aperturef/1.4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades10
Build
MountNikon Z
FormatAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.36 kg
Filter Thread43 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance200 mm

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

TTArtisan AF 23mm f/1.4 23mm

  • Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong build (70th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: TTArtisan AF 23mm f/1.4 23mm

Scores 46 overall, wins 1 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 18 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Besser bei:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

TTArtisan AF 23mm f/1.4 23mm Besser bei:

Macro