Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Viltrox LAB AF 135/1.8 FE 135mm
Viltrox
49 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Portrait
Professional
Budget
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Street
Macro
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Viltrox LAB AF 135/1.8 FE 135mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | telephoto |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 135 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | — | 14 |
| Groups | — | 9 |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | — | multilayer nanocoating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 11★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Sony E |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 1.24 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 82 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | VCM |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 720 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.25x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Viltrox LAB AF 135/1.8 FE 135mm
- Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong optical (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average build (25th percentile)
- Below average macro (33rd percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Preise
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
No current pricing available
Viltrox LAB AF 135/1.8 FE 135mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Viltrox LAB AF 135/1.8 FE 135mm
Scores 49 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 20 specs.
