Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Fujifilm GF 35-70mm f/4.5-5.6 WR 35-70mm

Fujifilm GF 35-70mm f/4.5-5.6 WR 35-70mm

Fujifilm
34 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
95
Fujifilm
40
Portrait
Nikon
89
Fujifilm
22
Street
Nikon
86
Fujifilm
36
Budget
Nikon
86
Fujifilm
34
Macro
Nikon
85
Fujifilm
36
Landscape
Nikon
83
Fujifilm
48
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Fujifilm
29
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Fujifilm
44
Travel
Nikon
75
Fujifilm
48

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Fujifilm GF 35-70mm f/4.5-5.6 WR 35-70mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm70 mm
Elements1311
Groups119
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements32
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/32
Min Aperturef/2.84.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZFujifilm G
Formatfull-framemedium-format
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.44 kg
Filter Thread67 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorAuto Focus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm350 mm
Max Magnification1:5.260.28x

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fujifilm GF 35-70mm f/4.5-5.6 WR 35-70mm

  • Strong build (77th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average social proof (32nd percentile)

Preise

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Fujifilm GF 35-70mm f/4.5-5.6 WR 35-70mm

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen