Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR 90mm
Fujifilm
67 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Macro
Budget
Street
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR 90mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 90 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 90 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 11 |
| Groups | 11 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | 0 |
| ED Elements | 3 | 3 |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | Super EBC Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 0.54 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 62 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor | Quad Linear Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 600 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26★ | 0.2x |
Vor- & Nachteile
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR 90mm
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong build (69th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (28th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
- Below average macro (34th percentile)
Preise
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.004Score pro Dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR 90mm0.003Score pro Dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR 90mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
