Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm

Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm

Laowa
30 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
95
Laowa
37
Portrait
Nikon
89
Laowa
30
Street
Nikon
86
Laowa
31
Budget
Nikon
86
Laowa
33
Macro
Nikon
85
Laowa
28
Landscape
Nikon
83
Laowa
32
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Laowa
32
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Laowa
36
Travel
Nikon
75
Laowa
25

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm200 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm200 mm
Elements1311
Groups119
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated1034
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg1.56 kg
Filter Thread67 mm105 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm1.50 m
Max Magnification1:5.260.15x

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm

  • Below average build (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
  • Below average macro (28th percentile)

Preise

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen