Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm

Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm

Sigma
38 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
95
Sigma
39
Portrait
Nikon
89
Sigma
34
Street
Nikon
86
Sigma
34
Budget
Nikon
86
Sigma
40
Macro
Nikon
85
Sigma
47
Landscape
Nikon
83
Sigma
39
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Sigma
40
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Sigma
34
Travel
Nikon
75
Sigma
34

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm105 mm
Elements1318
Groups1113
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8T22
Min Aperturef/2.8T3
Constant
Diaphragm Blades912
Build
MountNikon ZL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg1.30 kg
Filter Thread67 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm400 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:3.1

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm

  • Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (72nd percentile)
  • Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)

Preise

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen