Altura Photo YZ0308
Altura Photo
81 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma 36B965
Sigma
35 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Landscape
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Altura Photo YZ0308 | Sigma 36B965 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | — |
| Focal Length Min | — | 45 mm |
| Focal Length Max | — | 45 mm |
| Coating | multicoated glass optics | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/2.8 |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Screw-on lens fits camera lenses with a 55mm front filter thread | Sony E |
| Weight | 0.32 kg★ | 4.13 kg |
| Filter Thread | 55 mm | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM★ | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 55 mm★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Altura Photo YZ0308
- Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Sigma 36B965
- Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (30th percentile)
Preise
Altura Photo YZ03080.082Score pro Dollar
vs
Sigma 36B9650.002Score pro Dollar
Altura Photo YZ0308 bietet 41.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Altura Photo YZ0308
Sigma 36B965
Fazit
Gewinner: Altura Photo YZ0308
Scores 81 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 12 specs.
