Viltrox AF 85/2.0 Z
Viltrox
64 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Travel
Landscape
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Viltrox AF 85/2.0 Z | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 85 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 85 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 17 |
| Groups | 8 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 1 |
| ED Elements | 2 | 4★ |
| Coating | Nano Coating and Resistance Coating | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/2 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.88 kg | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM★ | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 740 mm | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:7.7★ | 0.5x |
Vor- & Nachteile
Viltrox AF 85/2.0 Z
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (76th percentile)
- Strong optical (67th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Preise
Viltrox AF 85/2.0 Z0.013Score pro Dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.004Score pro Dollar
Viltrox AF 85/2.0 Z bietet 3.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Viltrox AF 85/2.0 Z
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.
