Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm
Ricoh
72 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Panasonic
89 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Spezifikationen
| Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 40 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 40 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 7 | 17 |
| Groups | — | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | 0 | 4★ |
| Coating | Nano Crystal Coat | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | GR | L-Mount |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.26 kg★ | 0.41 kg |
| Filter Thread | 46 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | AF híbrido | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 120 mm★ | 140 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.5x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm
- Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong macro (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong build (78th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (23rd percentile)
Preise
Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm0.003Score pro Dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm0.004Score pro Dollar
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.
