Fujinon GF GF63mmF2.8 R WR 63mm

Fujinon GF GF63mmF2.8 R WR 63mm

Fujinon
18 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Portrait
Fujinon
11
Sigma
59
Budget
Fujinon
9
Sigma
56
Video Cinema
Fujinon
18
Sigma
47
Street
Fujinon
19
Sigma
46
Professional
Fujinon
31
Sigma
42
Travel
Fujinon
26
Sigma
40
Wildlife Sports
Fujinon
23
Sigma
39
Macro
Fujinon
35
Sigma
16
Landscape
Fujinon
31
Sigma
33

Spezifikationen

Fujinon GF GF63mmF2.8 R WR 63mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typeprime
Focal Length Min63 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max63 mm300 mm
Elements10
Groups8
ED Elements1
Coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/32f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Build
MountFujifilm G
Formatmedium-format
Weather Sealed
Weight0.40 kg
Filter Thread62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus only
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm

Vor- & Nachteile

Fujinon GF GF63mmF2.8 R WR 63mm

  • Strong build (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 44 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 17 specs.

Fujinon GF GF63mmF2.8 R WR 63mm Besser bei:

Macro

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Besser bei:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports