Sigma MC-11
Sigma
42 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Sony
89 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Video Cinema
Street
Budget
Professional
Travel
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Spezifikationen
| Sigma MC-11 | Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | — | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | — | 50 mm |
| Elements | — | 9 |
| Groups | — | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | — | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | — | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | — | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | Sony E |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weight | — | 0.12 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 249 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.215x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma MC-11
- Strong stabilization (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Strong aperture (72th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (70th percentile)
- Below average macro (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average optical (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average build (27th percentile)
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
Preise
Sigma MC-110.008Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.027Score pro Dollar
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm bietet 3.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Sigma MC-11
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 20 specs.
