Fujifilm X100 WCL-X100 II

Fujifilm X100 WCL-X100 II

Fujifilm
33 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony
83 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Street
Fujifilm
36
Sony
82
Travel
Fujifilm
18
Sony
81
Budget
Fujifilm
36
Sony
80
Portrait
Fujifilm
51
Sony
75
Wildlife Sports
Fujifilm
29
Sony
70
Video Cinema
Fujifilm
32
Sony
69
Landscape
Fujifilm
15
Sony
68
Professional
Fujifilm
27
Sony
63
Macro
Fujifilm
13
Sony
58

Spezifikationen

Fujifilm X100 WCL-X100 IISony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm
Elements9
Groups8
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements1
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5
Min Aperture3.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountFujifilm XSony E
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weight0.12 kg
Filter Thread41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypePZ
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance249 mm
Max Magnification0.215x

Vor- & Nachteile

Fujifilm X100 WCL-X100 II

  • Strong aperture (72nd percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (70th percentile)
  • Below average macro (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average optical (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average social proof (27th percentile)
  • Below average build (27th percentile)

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong aperture (77th percentile)
  • Below average macro (35th percentile)

Preise

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm is 5.067 MX$ cheaper (2.5x less).

Fujifilm X100 WCL-X100 II0.004Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.025Score pro Dollar

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm bietet 6.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fujifilm X100 WCL-X100 II

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Fazit

Gewinner: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Scores 83 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 20 specs.

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen