Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6

Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6

Canon
37 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Travel
Sony
99
Canon
45
Budget
Sony
91
Canon
46
Street
Sony
90
Canon
33
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Canon
26
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Canon
37
Landscape
Sony
79
Canon
38
Portrait
Sony
77
Canon
18
Professional
Sony
77
Canon
27
Macro
Sony
68
Canon
26

Spezifikationen

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSCanon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min16 mm75 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm300 mm
Elements9—
Groups8—
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements1★—
Coating—Super Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.532-45★
Min Aperture3.5-5.64-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountSony ECanon RF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.11 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread41 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusDC
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★1.49 m
Max Magnification0.215x0.25x★

Vor- & Nachteile

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6

  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average macro (30th percentile)

Preise

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6

No current pricing available

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen