Tamron Di III 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 RXD

Tamron Di III 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 RXD

Tamron
79 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Tamron
77
Nikon
95
Portrait
Tamron
76
Nikon
89
Street
Tamron
65
Nikon
86
Budget
Tamron
80
Nikon
86
Macro
Tamron
72
Nikon
85
Landscape
Tamron
68
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Tamron
74
Nikon
83
Travel
Tamron
79
Nikon
75
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
68
Nikon
78

Spezifikationen

Tamron Di III 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 RXDNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min28 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm28 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingFluorine coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperture2.8-5.6f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.57 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeRXDStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance200 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Vor- & Nachteile

Tamron Di III 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 RXD

  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Preise

Tamron Di III 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 RXD

No current pricing available

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 RXD Besser bei:

Travel

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen