HOLGA HL-C 60mm
HOLGA
40 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Video Cinema
Professional
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| HOLGA HL-C 60mm | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | standard | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 60 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 60 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | — | 17 |
| Groups | — | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/8 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/8 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | L-Mount |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.03 kg★ | 0.41 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.5x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
HOLGA HL-C 60mm
- Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Preise
HOLGA HL-C 60mm0.055Score pro Dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.004Score pro Dollar
HOLGA HL-C 60mm bietet 13.8x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
HOLGA HL-C 60mm
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
