HOLGA HL-C 60mm

HOLGA HL-C 60mm

Holga
40 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
89 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Holga
25
Canon
91
Landscape
Holga
34
Canon
83
Video Cinema
Holga
48
Canon
83
Professional
Holga
43
Canon
82
Travel
Holga
46
Canon
82
Budget
Holga
42
Canon
80
Wildlife Sports
Holga
37
Canon
79
Street
Holga
49
Canon
68
Portrait
Holga
45
Canon
53

Spezifikationen

HOLGA HL-C 60mmCanon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
Optics
Typestandardzoom
Focal Length Min60 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max60 mm70 mm
Elements15
Groups12
Aspherical Elements2
ED Elements2
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/8f/22
Min Aperturef/8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon FCanon RF
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.03 kg0.49 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlySTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance239 mm
Max Magnification1:4.2

Vor- & Nachteile

HOLGA HL-C 60mm

  • Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (66th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Preise

HOLGA HL-C 60mm

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen