Meike 35095 m43 35mm
Meike
44 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Video Cinema
Professional
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Meike 35095 m43 35mm | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 17 |
| Groups | 7 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | Multi-layer nano coating | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/0.95 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 13★ | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | L-Mount |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.38 kg★ | 0.41 kg |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 390 mm | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.5x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Meike 35095 m43 35mm
- Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Preise
Meike 35095 m43 35mm0.011Score pro Dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.004Score pro Dollar
Meike 35095 m43 35mm bietet 2.8x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Meike 35095 m43 35mm
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
