Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Meike 50mm f/0.95 50mm

Meike 50mm f/0.95 50mm

Meike
46 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
Meike
38
Portrait
Sigma
90
Meike
68
Street
Sigma
88
Meike
51
Budget
Sigma
85
Meike
41
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Meike
42
Macro
Sigma
83
Meike
37
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Meike
35
Landscape
Sigma
77
Meike
17
Travel
Sigma
75
Meike
25

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmMeike 50mm f/0.95 50mm
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm50 mm
Elements167
Groups115
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements5
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/0.95
Min Aperturef/2.8f/16
Constant
Diaphragm Blades913
Build
MountSony ECanon EF-M
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.42 kg
Filter Thread72 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm450 mm
Max Magnification1:5.55

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Meike 50mm f/0.95 50mm

  • Strong bokeh (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Below average optical (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports