Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon L RF 85mm f/1.2L USM 85mm

Canon L RF 85mm f/1.2L USM 85mm

Canon
53 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
Canon
56
Portrait
Sigma
90
Canon
50
Street
Sigma
88
Canon
51
Budget
Sigma
85
Canon
58
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Canon
52
Macro
Sigma
83
Canon
38
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Canon
59
Landscape
Sigma
77
Canon
43
Travel
Sigma
75
Canon
39

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmCanon L RF 85mm f/1.2L USM 85mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm85 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm85 mm
Elements168
Groups117
Aspherical Elements41
ED Elements51
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingAir Sphere Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.2
Constant
Diaphragm Blades98
Build
MountSony ECanon RF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg1.19 kg
Filter Thread72 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorUSM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm950 mm
Max Magnification1:5.550.12x

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Canon L RF 85mm f/1.2L USM 85mm

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average build (27th percentile)
  • Below average macro (28th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (35th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports