Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox
74 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony FE SEL2860 28-60mm

Sony FE SEL2860 28-60mm

Sony
49 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Street
Viltrox
74
Sony
47
Travel
Viltrox
59
Sony
71
Budget
Viltrox
68
Sony
54
Video Cinema
Viltrox
66
Sony
36
Portrait
Viltrox
65
Sony
26
Macro
Viltrox
65
Sony
52
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
65
Sony
50
Professional
Viltrox
59
Sony
45
Landscape
Viltrox
50
Sony
55

Spezifikationen

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mmSony FE SEL2860 28-60mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm60 mm
Elements118
Groups97
Aspherical Elements13
ED Elements1
Coatingnano multi-layer coating
Aperture
Max Aperture1632
Min Aperture1.74-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.17 kg0.17 kg
Filter Thread52 mm41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMLinear AF Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance330 mm300 mm
Max Magnification1:7.71:6.25

Vor- & Nachteile

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

  • Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony FE SEL2860 28-60mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (71th percentile)
  • Strong macro (67th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average aperture (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile

Preise

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

No current pricing available

Sony FE SEL2860 28-60mm

Fazit

Gewinner: Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Scores 74 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Sony FE SEL2860 28-60mm Besser bei:

TravelLandscape

Auch in Betracht ziehen