Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox
74 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Olympus Zuiko OPTM5020M43O 50mm

Olympus Zuiko OPTM5020M43O 50mm

Olympus
48 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Street
Viltrox
72
Olympus
57
Portrait
Viltrox
69
Olympus
68
Budget
Viltrox
68
Olympus
41
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
65
Olympus
47
Video Cinema
Viltrox
63
Olympus
50
Macro
Viltrox
62
Olympus
40
Travel
Viltrox
59
Olympus
46
Professional
Viltrox
53
Olympus
54
Landscape
Viltrox
50
Olympus
34

Spezifikationen

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mmOlympus Zuiko OPTM5020M43O 50mm
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min35 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm50 mm
Elements116
Groups95
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements11
Coatingnano multi-layer coatingHD Anti-Reflection
Aperture
Max Aperture16f/2.0
Min Aperture1.72.0
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony EMicro Four Thirds
FormatAPS-Cmicro-four-thirds
Weather Sealed
Weight0.17 kg0.19 kg
Filter Thread52 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMmanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance330 mm648 mm
Max Magnification1:7.70.52x

Vor- & Nachteile

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

  • Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Olympus Zuiko OPTM5020M43O 50mm

  • Strong bokeh (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong build (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong aperture (91th percentile)91th %ile
  • Strong social proof (71th percentile)
  • Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average optical (29th percentile)
  • Below average macro (34th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Scores 74 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports