Thypoch Simera-C TP-SCCZ-MRF 135mm

Thypoch Simera-C TP-SCCZ-MRF 135mm

Thypoch
25 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Portrait
Thypoch
24
Sigma
59
Budget
Thypoch
28
Sigma
56
Video Cinema
Thypoch
20
Sigma
47
Street
Thypoch
16
Sigma
46
Professional
Thypoch
15
Sigma
42
Travel
Thypoch
20
Sigma
40
Wildlife Sports
Thypoch
12
Sigma
39
Landscape
Thypoch
17
Sigma
33
Macro
Thypoch
23
Sigma
16

Spezifikationen

Thypoch Simera-C TP-SCCZ-MRF 135mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min70 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm300 mm
Aperture
Max ApertureT22f/3.5
Min ApertureT2.9
Constant
Diaphragm Blades16
Build
MountInterchangeable Mount with Included Leica M/Nikon Z
Formatfull-frame
Weight1.60 kg
Filter Thread77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance760 mm

Vor- & Nachteile

Thypoch Simera-C TP-SCCZ-MRF 135mm

  • Strong versatility (69th percentile)
  • Below average build (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 44 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 14 specs.

Thypoch Simera-C TP-SCCZ-MRF 135mm Besser bei:

Macro

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Besser bei:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports