Sigma Sports 185956 500mm

Sigma Sports 185956 500mm

Sigma
36 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
43
Nikon
89
Macro
Sigma
45
Nikon
88
Budget
Sigma
34
Nikon
85
Street
Sigma
32
Nikon
84
Portrait
Sigma
26
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Sigma
42
Nikon
82
Landscape
Sigma
45
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
40
Nikon
73
Travel
Sigma
31
Nikon
70

Spezifikationen

Sigma Sports 185956 500mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typesuper-telephotozoom
Focal Length Min500 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max500 mm28 mm
Elements1613
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements33
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/32f/2.8
Min Aperturef/4f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSigma SANikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight3.17 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread46 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHyper Sonic AFStepping Motor★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance3.50 m190 mm★
Max Magnification1:6.671:5.26

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Sports 185956 500mm

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average build (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average macro (33rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Preise

Sigma Sports 185956 500mm

No current pricing available

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen