Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

Tamron
56 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
74 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Travel
Tamron
50
Sony
88
Landscape
Tamron
37
Sony
75
Street
Tamron
47
Sony
74
Budget
Tamron
67
Sony
71
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
36
Sony
67
Professional
Tamron
41
Sony
66
Video Cinema
Tamron
48
Sony
64
Macro
Tamron
48
Sony
60
Portrait
Tamron
56
Sony
58

Spezifikationen

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mmSony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min16 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm50 mm
Elements—9
Groups—8
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements—1★
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/3.5
Min Aperture—3.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountCanon EF-SSony E
Format—APS-C★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.54 kg0.11 kg★
Filter Thread—41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm250 mm★
Max Magnification—0.215x★

Vor- & Nachteile

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (76th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (74th percentile)
  • Strong macro (71st percentile)
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average build (22nd percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong optical (69th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)

Preise

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

No current pricing available

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 74 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen