Nikon NIKKOR 1910 16mm
Nikon
62 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Tamron
99 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Video Cinema
Budget
Professional
Macro
Portrait
Landscape
Travel
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Nikon NIKKOR 1910 16mm | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | fisheye | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 16 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | — | 16 |
| Groups | — | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | Nikon super integrated coating | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.29 kg★ | 0.54 kg |
| Filter Thread | 39 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | D-type autofocus | RXD |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:4.8★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Nikon NIKKOR 1910 16mm
- Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong build (77th percentile)
- Strong macro (77th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
Preise
Nikon NIKKOR 1910 16mm0.003Score pro Dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD0.007Score pro Dollar
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD bietet 2.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Nikon NIKKOR 1910 16mm
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Fazit
Gewinner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Scores 99 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.
