Nikon NIKKOR 1910 16mm
Nikon
62 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
87 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Portrait
Spezifikationen
| Nikon NIKKOR 1910 16mm | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | fisheye | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 16 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | — | 17 |
| Groups | — | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | Nikon super integrated coating | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.29 kg★ | 0.41 kg |
| Filter Thread | 39 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | D-type autofocus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.5x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Nikon NIKKOR 1910 16mm
- Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong macro (77th percentile)
- Strong build (77th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong build (78th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Preise
Nikon NIKKOR 1910 16mm0.003Score pro Dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.004Score pro Dollar
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Nikon NIKKOR 1910 16mm
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 87 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
