HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E
HK Meike
42 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Tamron
97 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Video Cinema
Budget
Macro
Professional
Travel
Portrait
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | — | 16 |
| Groups | — | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | — | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Sony E |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.29 kg★ | 0.54 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | RXD |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:4.8★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E
- Strong build (70th percentile)
- Strong aperture (66th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
Preise
HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E0.013Score pro Dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm0.007Score pro Dollar
HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E bietet 1.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Scores 97 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.
