HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E
HK Meike
43 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
89 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Travel
Budget
Street
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Portrait
Professional
Macro
Spezifikationen
| HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | — | 9 |
| Groups | — | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | — | f/5.6 |
| Min Aperture | f/2 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Sony E |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.29 kg | 0.11 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.215x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E
- Strong build (70th percentile)
- Strong aperture (66th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
Preise
HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E0.013Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.027Score pro Dollar
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS bietet 2.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Fazit
Gewinner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.
