Sony DT 55-200mm f/4-5.6 SAM
Sony
66 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Sony DT 55-200mm f/4-5.6 SAM | Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 55 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | — | 16 |
| Groups | — | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 5★ |
| Coating | — | Super Multi-Layer Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | 4-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony A | Sony E |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.31 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | SAM | Stepping AF Motor |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 950 mm | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.29x | 1:5.55★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sony DT 55-200mm f/4-5.6 SAM
- Strong versatility (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong social proof (74th percentile)
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average macro (32nd percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
Fazit
Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.