GPD Pocket 4 Black 2025
GPD
66 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI Gaming Laptop 16"
Acer
48 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Compact
Gaming
Entertainment
Creator
Student
Developer
Business
Ai Llm
Spezifikationen
| GPD Pocket 4 | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI Gaming Laptop 16" | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 12 | 24★ |
| Frequency | 2.0 GHz | 2.7 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 36 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | AMD Radeon 890M | 5070 Ti★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | integrated★ | discrete |
| VRAM | — | 12 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | System Shared | GDDR7 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Generation | LPDDR5X★ | — |
| Storage 1 | 2 TB★ | 1 TB |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD★ | — |
| Display | ||
| Size | — | 16" |
| Resolution | 2560 px★ | — |
| Panel | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 240 Hz★ |
| Brightness | 500 nits★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2★ | — |
| USB Ports | 2★ | — |
| Thunderbolt | USB 4.0 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E★ | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3★ | — |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.73 kg★ | 2.70 kg |
| Battery | 45 Wh★ | — |
| OS | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 |
Vor- & Nachteile
GPD Pocket 4 Black 2025
- Strong storage (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong ram (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong cpu (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average reliability (4th percentile)4th %ile
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI Gaming Laptop 16"
- Strong cpu (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong gpu (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong ram (73rd percentile)
- Strong screen (72nd percentile)
- Below average port selection (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average portability (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average reliability (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average social proof (26th percentile)
Preise
GPD Pocket 4 Black 2025
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI Gaming Laptop 16"
Fazit
Gewinner: GPD Pocket 4
Scores 66 overall, wins 5 of 8 usage categories and 12 of 28 specs.
