JBL Quantum JBLQUANTUM100WHTAM
JBL
54 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Beyerdynamic
87 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Commute
Music
Studio
Gaming
Work
Calls
Spezifikationen
| JBL Quantum JBLQUANTUM100WHTAM | Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.22 kg | 0.22 kg |
| Ear Cushion | memory foam | replaceable ear pads |
| Headband | — | aluminum and durable textiles |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 45 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 22 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 48 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | JBL Quantum 100 - Wired Over-Ear Gaming Headphones - White, Large | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC |
| Surround | JBL Quantum 100 - Wired Over-Ear Gaming Headphones - White, Large | JBL Quantum 100 - Wired Over-Ear Gaming Headphones | 050036369695 | B084CZT5SX | 1.0 Count | Foam | JBL Quantum 100 - White | 7.8 ou | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | — | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Cable Length | 1.2000000476837158 m | — |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 60 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15-minute charge for up to 15 hours of listening time |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Capacity | — | 630 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 2★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Fast Pair |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | ✗ |
| App | — | beyerdynamic app |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | Water-Resistant | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
JBL Quantum JBLQUANTUM100WHTAM
- Strong mic (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Strong comfort (67th percentile)
- Below average sound (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
Preise
JBL Quantum JBLQUANTUM100WHTAM0.067Score pro Dollar
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 10016090.025Score pro Dollar
JBL Quantum JBLQUANTUM100WHTAM bietet 2.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Scores 87 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 42 specs.
