JBL Tune 520C
JBL
47 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Apple AirPods Max MWW43AM/A
Apple
89 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Calls
Gaming
Work
Commute
Studio
Music
Spezifikationen
| JBL Tune 520C | Apple AirPods Max MWW43AM/A | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | — | 0.39 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | soft ear cushions | Mesh textile, memory foam |
| Headband | — | Stainless steel |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 32 mm | 40 mm★ |
| Drivers | 2★ | 1 |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Spatial Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Enhanced |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | USB-C | USB-C |
| Detachable Cable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Range | — | 15.199999809265137 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 20 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10min=4hrs |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 3★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | voice assistant | Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | — | iOS Only |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
Vor- & Nachteile
JBL Tune 520C
- Strong sound (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong build (76th percentile)
- Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
Apple AirPods Max MWW43AM/A
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong sound (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong build (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
Preise
JBL Tune 520C
Apple AirPods Max MWW43AM/A
No current pricing available
Fazit
Gewinner: Apple AirPods Max MWW43AM/A
Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 39 specs.
