Philips 197304
Philips
49 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Beyerdynamic
84 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Commute
Music
Studio
Gaming
Work
Calls
Spezifikationen
| Philips 197304 | Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.16 kg★ | 0.22 kg |
| Ear Cushion | Foam | replaceable ear pads |
| Headband | — | aluminum and durable textiles |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 45 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 22 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 48 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 95 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | sound_isolation, push_button, Wired, Over Ear, dynamic_driver | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | — | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | USB-C | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 1.5199999809265137 m | — |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 60 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15-minute charge for up to 15 hours of listening time |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Capacity | — | 630 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 2 |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Fast Pair |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | beyerdynamic app |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX7 | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Philips 197304
- Strong comfort (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong mic (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong build (76th percentile)
- Below average social proof (23rd percentile)
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
Preise
Philips 1973040.068Score pro Dollar
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 10016090.024Score pro Dollar
Philips 197304 bietet 2.8x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 42 specs.
