Focal Celestee

Focal Celestee

Focal
46 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Audio-Technica ATH-R50X

Audio-Technica ATH-R50X

Audio-Technica
62 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Studio
Focal
48
Audio-Technica
83
Music
Focal
47
Audio-Technica
74
Budget
Focal
50
Audio-Technica
71
Gaming
Focal
34
Audio-Technica
44
Commute
Focal
29
Audio-Technica
33
Work
Focal
28
Audio-Technica
29
Calls
Focal
19
Audio-Technica
21

Spezifikationen

Focal CelesteeAudio-Technica ATH-R50X
Design
Form Factorover-earover-ear
Open/Closedclosedopen
Weight0.16 kg0.21 kg
Ear Cushionsemi-aniline leathervelour
Headbandleather and microfiber
Audio
Driver Typeelectrodynamicdynamic
Driver Size40 mm45 mm
Freq Min5 Hz
Freq Max23 kHz40 kHz
Impedance35 Ω50 Ω
Sensitivity93.30000305175781 dB
CodecsAudio-Technica ATH-R50x Professional Open-Back Over-Ear Reference Headphones, Black, 3-Pack
Connectivity
Wired Connector3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Cable Length3 m

Vor- & Nachteile

Focal Celestee

  • Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong comfort (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (1th percentile)1th %ile
  • Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average anc (30th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Audio-Technica ATH-R50X

  • Strong social proof (91th percentile)91th %ile
  • Strong sound (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong build (76th percentile)
  • Strong user sentiment (70th percentile)
  • Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average anc (30th percentile)

Preise

Audio-Technica ATH-R50X is 20.316 MX$ cheaper (7.4x less).

Focal Celestee0.002Score pro Dollar
vs
Audio-Technica ATH-R50X0.020Score pro Dollar

Audio-Technica ATH-R50X bietet 10.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Audio-Technica ATH-R50X

Fazit

Gewinner: Audio-Technica ATH-R50X

Scores 62 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 5 of 15 specs.

Audio-Technica ATH-R50X Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute

Auch in Betracht ziehen