Apple BLUE300

Apple BLUE300

Apple
24 Gesamtbewertung
vs
TOZO HT3

TOZO HT3

TOZO
92 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Apple
19
TOZO
84
Gaming
Apple
36
TOZO
82
Work
Apple
24
TOZO
73
Music
Apple
29
TOZO
73
Studio
Apple
31
TOZO
73
Commute
Apple
16
TOZO
71
Calls
Apple
28
TOZO
69

Spezifikationen

Apple BLUE300TOZO HT3
Design
Form Factoron-earover-ear
Open/Closedclosed
Foldable
Weight0.22 kg0.25 kg
Ear CushionSponge
HeadbandSilicone Protein Sponge
Audio
Driver TypeNeodymiumdynamic
Driver Size40 mm40 mm
Drivers2
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsTOZO HT3 Hybrid Noise Cancelling Headphones, 90H Battery Life Wireless Over Ear Bluetooth 6.0 Foldable Headset, AI Voice Assistant with 5 Mics, Connect 2 Devices and Hi-Res Sound, 32 EQ Audio Presets
SurroundSpatial Audio
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptive
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth4.06.0
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm
Range15 m
Battery
Battery Life8 hrs90 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10 min for 9 hours playback
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Boom Mic
Detachable Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO
Gaming Mode
Water ResistanceIPX4

Vor- & Nachteile

Apple BLUE300

  • Strong mic (66th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average battery (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average comfort (29th percentile)
  • Below average anc (30th percentile)

TOZO HT3

  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong battery (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: TOZO HT3

Scores 92 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 11 of 37 specs.

TOZO HT3 Besser bei:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute