Shokz S661
Shokz
50 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Beyerdynamic
82 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Commute
Gaming
Music
Work
Studio
Calls
Spezifikationen
| Shokz S661 | Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | open | closed |
| Foldable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.22 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | — | replaceable ear pads |
| Headband | — | aluminum and durable textiles |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | bone conduction | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 45 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 22 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 48 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 96 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | — | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 |
| Multipoint | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | USB-C | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | — | ✓★ |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 6 hrs | 40 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 Minutes for 15 Hours |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Capacity | — | 630 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 2★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri, Google Assistant | Google Fast Pair |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | beyerdynamic app |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IP55 | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Shokz S661
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong connectivity (77th percentile)
- Strong mic (73rd percentile)
- Below average battery (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average comfort (34th percentile)
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
Preise
Shokz S6610.025Score pro Dollar
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 10016090.016Score pro Dollar
Shokz S661 bietet 1.6x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Shokz S661
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Fazit
Gewinner: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 41 specs.
