Focal Celestee FCELESTEE
Focal
48 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Beyerdynamic
87 Gesamtbewertung
Was Käufer sagen
Focal Celestee FCELESTEE
92 von 100 geringe Konfidenz 6 Bewertungen
Die Focal Celestee Kopfhörer werden für ihre außergewöhnliche Klangklarheit und Detailtreue gelobt, die ein völlig neues Musikerlebnis ermöglichen. Nutzer heben die ausgewogene Frequenzwiedergabe hervor, bemängeln jedoch das kurze mitgelieferte Kabel und empfehlen die Verwendung eines DACs für optimale Leistung.
Vorteile
- Außergewöhnliche Klangklarheit
- Ausgewogener Frequenzgang
- Bequemer Sitz
- Schönes Design
- Enthüllt neue Nuancen
Nachteile
- Kurzes mitgeliefertes Kabel
- Erfordert DAC für volles Potenzial
- Hoher Preis
Sound quality 6
Detail retrieval 5
Build quality 3
Comfort 2
Cable length 2
Dac requirement 2
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Noch kein Kundenfeedback
Bewertungen
Budget
Commute
Music
Studio
Gaming
Work
Calls
Spezifikationen
| Focal Celestee FCELESTEE | Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.16 kg★ | 0.22 kg |
| Ear Cushion | semi-aniline leather | replaceable ear pads |
| Headband | leather on the outside with microfiber on the inside | aluminum and durable textiles |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 45 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 23 kHz★ | 22 kHz |
| Impedance | 35 Ω | 48 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | — | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | — | ✓★ |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 60 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15-minute charge for up to 15 hours of listening time |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Capacity | — | 630 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 2★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Fast Pair |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | beyerdynamic app |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Focal Celestee FCELESTEE
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong comfort (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
- Strong sound (66th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
Preise
Focal Celestee FCELESTEE0.002Score pro Dollar
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 10016090.025Score pro Dollar
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 bietet 12.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Scores 87 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 39 specs.
