RØDE NTH-50 NTH50
RØDE
39 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Beyerdynamic
82 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Commute
Music
Gaming
Work
Studio
Calls
Spezifikationen
| RØDE NTH-50 NTH50 | Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.22 kg | 0.22 kg |
| Ear Cushion | memory foam | replaceable ear pads |
| Headband | aluminum | aluminum and durable textiles |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 45 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 5 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 35 kHz★ | 22 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 48 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Adaptive |
| Transparency | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | — | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 1.7000000476837158 m | — |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 40 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 Minutes for 15 Hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Capacity | — | 630 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 2★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Fast Pair |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | beyerdynamic app |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
Vor- & Nachteile
RØDE NTH-50 NTH50
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong sound (75th percentile)
- Strong comfort (68th percentile)
- Below average social proof (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average mic (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
Preise
RØDE NTH-50 NTH500.018Score pro Dollar
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 10016090.015Score pro Dollar
RØDE NTH-50 NTH50 bietet 1.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
RØDE NTH-50 NTH50
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Fazit
Gewinner: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 41 specs.
