Skullcandy Indy Evo
Skullcandy
28 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0050
Bose
91 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Travel
Music
Calls
Gaming
Commute
Fitness
Spezifikationen
| Skullcandy Indy Evo | Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0050 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | Small, Medium, Large |
| Weight | — | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | aptX Adaptive |
| Surround | — | Spatial Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, HFP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Range | — | 9.100000381469727 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 6 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 3 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | Rapid Charge | 20 Minutes for 2 Hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 30 hrs★ | 18 hrs |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 2★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | assistant | Siri, Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Tile | Bose app |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IP55 | IPX4 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Skullcandy Indy Evo
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average battery (24th percentile)
- Below average sound (27th percentile)
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (31st percentile)
Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0050
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (96th percentile)96th %ile
Preise
Skullcandy Indy Evo
Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0050
Fazit
Gewinner: Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0050
Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 35 specs.
