BZINK

BZINK

BZINK
45 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Anker D1202

Anker D1202

Anker
91 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
BZINK
60
Anker
88
Fitness
BZINK
29
Anker
77
Travel
BZINK
29
Anker
77
Gaming
BZINK
43
Anker
75
Commute
BZINK
28
Anker
74
Music
BZINK
41
Anker
73
Calls
BZINK
28
Anker
70

Spezifikationen

BZINKAnker D1202
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styleear-tiptrue wireless
Ear Tips3 sets of soft eartipsXS, S, M, L
Weight0.04 kg0.06 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size11 mm11 mm
Drivers11
Freq Max40 kHz
Impedance20 Ω14.199999809265137 Ω
Sensitivity120 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsUSB C Headphones for iPhone 16 15 Pro Max Plus,H89 Type C Earphones with Microphone Deep Bass Crystal Clear Sound Ear Buds,USBC Wired Earbuds for Google Pixel Galaxy S24 S23 S22 S21 S20 A53LDAC
SurroundSpatial Audio
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptive
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth6.0
Wired ConnectorUSB Type C
Earbud Battery
Battery Life10 hrs
Charge Time3 hrs
Fast Charging10 min for 3.5 hours playback
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery50 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count6
NC Mic
Features
Touch Controls
Appsoundcore
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIP55

Vor- & Nachteile

BZINK

  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong sound (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong comfort (73rd percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (30th percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

Anker D1202

  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile

Preise

BZINK is 389 MX$ cheaper (2.3x less).

BZINK0.153Score pro Dollar
vs
Anker D12020.133Score pro Dollar

BZINK bietet 1.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gewinner: Anker D1202

Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 11 of 33 specs.

Anker D1202 Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Auch in Betracht ziehen