JVC HAEB75S

JVC HAEB75S

JVC
32 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010

Bose
96 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
JVC
45
Bose
90
Calls
JVC
13
Bose
85
Travel
JVC
24
Bose
84
Gaming
JVC
21
Bose
82
Music
JVC
34
Bose
79
Commute
JVC
22
Bose
78
Fitness
JVC
34
Bose
78

Spezifikationen

JVC HAEB75SBose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styleear-cliptrue wireless
Ear TipsSmall, Medium, Large
Weight0.01 kg
Audio
Driver Typeneodymiumdynamic
Driver Size13.5 mm
Drivers21
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance16 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsaptX Adaptive
SurroundSpatial Audio
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
ProfilesA2DP, HFP
Multipoint
Range9.100000381469727 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life6 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging20 Minutes for 2 Hours
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery18 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSiri, Google Assistant
Touch Controls
AppBose app
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceWater-ResistantIPX4

Vor- & Nachteile

JVC HAEB75S

  • Strong sound (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong build (72nd percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average mic (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average comfort (28th percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010

  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong comfort (94th percentile)94th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 20 of 38 specs.

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010 Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness