TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
83 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Redzoo Flame

Redzoo Flame

Redzoo
43 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
TOZO
79
Redzoo
54
Gaming
TOZO
79
Redzoo
44
Travel
TOZO
76
Redzoo
28
Fitness
TOZO
73
Redzoo
32
Commute
TOZO
70
Redzoo
26
Calls
TOZO
69
Redzoo
36
Music
TOZO
69
Redzoo
41

Spezifikationen

TOZO Crystal PodsRedzoo Flame
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelessear-hook, in-ear
Ear TipsMediumXS, S, M, L
Weight0.04 kg0.11 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm11 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACSBC, AAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.45.0
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs16 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5IPX7

Vor- & Nachteile

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong anc (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile

Redzoo Flame

  • Strong social proof (76th percentile)
  • Strong sound (76th percentile)
  • Strong comfort (71st percentile)
  • Below average battery (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average anc (29th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (31st percentile)
  • Below average build (33rd percentile)

Preise

TOZO Crystal Pods

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 83 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 34 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Auch in Betracht ziehen