Apple ASE-600

Apple ASE-600

Apple
23 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro

Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro

Samsung
97 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Apple
31
Samsung
99
Fitness
Apple
21
Samsung
94
Commute
Apple
18
Samsung
90
Travel
Apple
20
Samsung
89
Calls
Apple
20
Samsung
89
Gaming
Apple
21
Samsung
85
Music
Apple
19
Samsung
82

Spezifikationen

Apple ASE-600Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear TipsLarge, Small
Weight0.18 kg0.01 kg
Audio
Driver TypedynamicDynamic
Driver Size10.5 mm
Drivers2
Freq Max96 kHz
Impedance16 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAZLA ASE-600 ASMR Wired Earbuds with Microphone – Soft Silicone Earphones for School, Comfortable in-Ear Headphones, USB-C Wired Earbuds for Long Listening - Apple iPhone 16 Headphones (Silver)AAC, Samsung Seamless, SBC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
ProfilesA2DP, AVRCP, HFP, PBP, TMAP
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorBluetooth
Earbud Battery
Battery Life6 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast ChargingYes
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery26 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Capacity53 mAh
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count6
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantBixby, Google Assistant
Touch Controls
AppGalaxy Wearable App
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIP57

Vor- & Nachteile

Apple ASE-600

  • Strong comfort (71th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average sound (27th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (28th percentile)
  • Below average anc (29th percentile)

Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro

Scores 97 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 37 specs.

Samsung Galaxy Buds Buds3 Pro Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness